As the Arizona Republic – like most of the rest of the media – snidely gloats and gaslights that crazy Trumpers cannot get it through their unvaxxed heads that courts found not a “shred of evidence” to show cheating in AZ, a quick look at the cases shows a good reason for this: the courts never looked.
Laurie Roberts at the Arizona Republic wrote in December:
“After eight lawsuits in which judges found not one shred of evidence that Arizona’s election was stolen, surprise! Far-right Republicans now claim to have new proof of fraud.”
But in one instance where a judge did look, last December, one sample of mail-in ballots in Maricopa County found 11% of ballots in which the signatures were deemed “inconclusive,” meaning one could “not testify that the signature on the envelope/affidavit matched the signature on file. ” And this was by the defendants’ – the slate of Biden electors – own expert.
The order by AZ Superior Court Judge Randall Warner in Ward v. Jackson et al reads:
” The Court ordered that counsel and their forensic document examiners could review 100 randomly selected envelope/affidavits to do a signature comparison. These were envelope/affidavits as to which election officials had found a signature match…”
“Defendants’ expert testified that 11 of the 100 envelopes were inconclusive…”
Another 100 ballots examined by plaintiff’s expert, the Trump team, found 6% of the signatures “inconclusive.”
The judge said there was no evidence of “forgery or simulation,” which only means any attempts to fake a signature.
Nevertheless, Judge Randall found nothing alarming in 6% to 11% of two random samples of ballots not matching “the signature on file,” even though, were this error rate to hold, with 1.9 million total presidential votes cast in Maricopa County, with easily 60% of that mail-in ballot, that would represent roughly 70,000 to 130,000 votes.
Biden was certified the winner of AZ by a razor thin 10,000 votes.
Judge Randall’s order states:
“Approximately 1.9 million mail-in ballots were cast and, of these, approximately 20,000 were identified that required contacting the voter. Of those, only 587 ultimately could not be validated.”
Below: Clip from court ruling, source

So if the error rate holds, nowhere near that potentially questionable number of ballots were followed up, before being added to the totals.
We can assume Superior Court judges are smart and can do math, and can understand that 6%, 11% are big numbers on this playing field.
Oh yes, Judge Randall Warner was appointed to the bench by then AZ Governor Janet Napolitano, who became Obama’s director of Homeland Security.
A sampling of the cacaphonic headlines on the Maricopa audit show a withering assault on anyone daring to question what we have been told has already been settled: that multiple courts found not a “shred of evidence” of election fraud, as Laurie Roberts tells us, as we have heard the ad nauseum talking point on major media.
Yet Judge Warner’s court stands out, because he was the only judge to not dismiss his case out-of-hand, as moot, or on procedural grounds, like filing too late.
A valuable resource for Americans, of the right, left, or in between, of the 2020 election fraud lawsuits is here, 2020 US Presidential Election Lawsuits.
Using a tried and true judicial tactic when it comes to election integrity challenges, Maricopa Superior Court Judge Daniel Kiley, before any discovery process, ruled that the case would not impact election outcome, and so dismissed it. (Trump v. Hobbs) Thus arguing, in an admirable embodiment of Joseph Heller’s “Catch 22” principle, that there was no point in trying the case. Why? Because it would not affect the outcome. How do we know it would not affect the outcome? Because there was no point in trying the case.
The Maricopa audit is a waste of money! One surprising quarter, the ordinarily Constitution and civil liberties-loving Brennan Center, even urged:
“the Arizona Senate to stop efforts that could undermine confidence in our elections and accept the Maricopa County election results.”
What? An audit can undermine confidence in elections? Now water runs uphill.
Don’t Democrats know how bad this looks?
But never mind that two separate samples of ballots, independently, show that in possibly hundreds of thousands of Maricopa ballots, there is no signature match. The higher estimate even arrived at by Team Biden. When will those uneducated, unvaxxed, inbred Deporables believe their social betters that there is “not one shred of evidence?” That they are crazy and stupid?
Maybe. But they can still read.
More Important Reading…
As of Feb. 28th Over 1,600 Deaths Possibly Related to COVID Injections Reported to CDC (Now 3,000)
Canadian Health Authority Bans Many Blue Masks Over Severe Lung Damage, Fauci Says “Double Mask”
Former Pfizer VP on mRNA Injections: Governments “Lying” Because “They’re going to kill you and your family.”
Hoover Institution Fellow Steve Hilton, NIH Documents: Fauci Funded Wuhan Virus
Biochips Would Be Banned by MA Bill to Ban “Vaccine Passports”
Florida Activists File Model Legislation Against Mandatory COVID Vaccinations
Harvard-MIT Scientist Says COVID-19 Man-Made, Bill Gates Says Next Pandemic “WILL Get Attention” as Scientists Warn of Millions Dead Due to Vaccine Flaw
Israelis File Crimes Against Humanity Lawsuit Over Coerced COVID Shots, Citing Nuremberg Code
Los Angeles School District and NYC Teachers Sue Over COVID Mandates, Cite Nuremberg













